Chelsea lodge Clattenburg complaint

So it's Ok for players to use foul language to an official, but when it's given back the little baby goes crying for his mama. If Players "give it " to the Ref then they shoiuld expect to take a bit back................​...............oh no they can't can they!!!

Clattenburg was awful today, but when has he been any different? 

Chelsea you are sad!. If the ref booked people every time inappropriate language was aimed at him or his assistants, the pitch would be empty before half time.

'Did he intend to dive? I thought he went down,' said the Scot. 'I think Jonny may have just caught him a little bit but he can either carry on running - which he could have done - but he chose to go down.

What would Ronaldo have done in his pomp, need we ask just look at You Tube and would Fergie have backed him up for going down as he so often did, need we ask again.

I don't blame them, clattenburg hasn't took charge of a Utd game since sending off Evans last season when City hammered them 6-1, he was really poor, I don't think ivanovic could help the contact, Torres was fouled by Evans and that Mexican geezer was offside!!! 

For Colin Macartney and other arm chair lip readers : Fergi smiled knowingly as he said his team’s (United) third goal was off side and Torres (Chelsea) was clipped before he was sent off for diving. On a more serious note the Chelsea manager has submitted an official complaint to the referees association alleging that the match referee Mark Clattenburg used racial language on two occasion’s. reference his players. Several things should happen here' unlike in the racism case against Terry. In the first instance the police should step in immediately and assess the situation and if they find there is a case to answer hand a report to the department of public of prosecutions and bring the case to court. In the event this happens any person, including football pundits. members of the House of Lords or the PC brigade who pre judge the trial via the media and suggests the defendant is guilty before the trial takes place should be charged by the DPP with an act of sub judice and the pundit or others should be suspended then if found guilty sacked from say the BBC. Of course any such person in retaliation my through a civil court wish to sue the BBC for sacking them on the grounds of racial discrimination. However in the event Clatenberug is found not guilty the Manager of Chelsea should be sacked together with the players who accused the referee of racism ( inappropriate language). In this case unlike that of Terry where not one of 40, 0000 spectators police or officials at the match heard what he said; (the case was brought against Terry by an off duty police officer sat at home watching the TV who allegedly lip read the racist words Terry’s mouthed) on this occasion every word Clattenberg said was heard via a radio link by the assistant referee, lines man and fourth official. So the only chance of a miscarriage of justice taking place revolves about the fact that all four match official must collude in order to pervert the course of justice. So any oriental linguist watching the match on the TV in Beijing China who lip read the referees alleged racist remarks will not be required as a material witness at the trial of the referee.
 

i think the ref should use harsh lanugage it mite make them more imposing to players who mite then learn not to argue with them