Updated: 20/06/2012 21:55 | By pa.press.net

Murray falls to Tipsarevic



Andy Murray (© pictured)

Andy Murray (pictured) suffered a 6-7 (5/7) 6-4 10-7 defeat to Janko Tipsarevic at Stoke Park

Andy Murray endured a further setback in his preparations for Wimbledon after slipping to defeat against Janko Tipsarevic at The Boodles tournament.

Murray, who was installed as fourth seed at the All England Club earlier on Wednesday, crashed out of the AEGON Championships in the opening round last week.

And in only his second match on grass before SW19 begins next Monday, the 25-year-old was beaten 6-7 (5/7) 6-4 10-7 by Tipsarevic amid the grand surroundings of Stoke Park.

Murray, however, will be grateful for a challenging afternoon against the world number eight from Serbia as he fine-tunes his build up to Wimbledon.

Several lively rallies lit up the third game and Tipsarevic was pushed hard on his serve before holding. The opening set continued to be keenly contested with both players' serves proving impenetrable and a tie break was needed to separate them.

Twice Murray trailed with Tipsarevic serving at 5-4 up, but twice the Scot fought back as he steadied his nerve.

Finally making inroads with his serve, he clinched the first set by outmanoeuvring Tipsarevic before firing a simple forehand.

Murray fired a stunning forehand early in the second set only to be broken in the fifth game, Tipsarevic somehow getting his racket to a bullet serve and the Scot then finding the net.

Two break points arrived in a hard-fought 10th but Murray was unable to capitalise on either, ushering in a tie break to decide the match with the rivals locked at one set each.

Murray showed his frustration as he was beaten by an easy backhand to trail 6-4 and he continued to be outgunned as Tipsarevic prevailed in the first to 10 decider.

18Comments
20/06/2012 20:44
avatar

I'll just repeat the point I made on the other article. Andy Murray is actually very consistant at the major tournaments. Last year he reached the semifinals of all four grandslams (only the seventh person in history to achieve that btw.) The last time he was knocked out in the 4th round of Wimbledon was SIX years ago, when he ranked 16 in the world. To put that into context, consider the fact Murray has played at Wimbledon for 7 years now and has won 80% of his matches (current world number 1 Djokovic has won 81% over the same period, and probably the greatest tennis player of all time - Roger Federer - has won 94% of Wimbledon matches.)

I guess the point I'm making, is that nobody here seems to actually know anything about tennis, so why would Andy Murray care about your uneducated, biased opinions? Give the guy a break already.

21/06/2012 00:58
avatar

Oh Stuart, small minded man. Andy Murray is a great player. He will win a major tournament.  For me though, these people who are so anti-Murray must simply be using it as an excuse for not liking him as a person anyway or perhaps just hate Scotland.

 

I can understand some people in England not warming to him generally as Andy Murray’s public persona has been that of a fairly grumpy individual who is intensly focused on his game (presumably the reason for his success so surely a good thing), as opposed to the more cheerful demeanour of Tim Henman, who also happened to be the epitome of the English rural middle-class.

 

Whilst, the comment about supporting “anyone but England” has been overinflated. After all it was only said in jest, whilst he was being ribbed by a sports presenter and Tim Henman for the inability of the Scottish football team to qualify for the World Cup. What annoys me more is the hypocrisy of many who say it. After all, how many football fans out there don’t get a smug satisfaction in seeing their biggest rival fail in a football match, especially if that team is a team that has traditionally been one of the most successful around.

20/06/2012 22:07
avatar
Murray should get off the grass, it slows your reactions down. Seriously though, a shot of whisky would gee him up a bit. If he is thinking about North Sea oil during matches, this would be a big mistake. Get that chip off your shoulder. You worry so much about the south and the east you forget the Icelandic are nicking your fish. Concentrate on the game lad, and leave the politics to the fat boys.
20/06/2012 23:18
avatar

Ok then, not sure why Don Westlake is so angry...

 

I was just pointing out that Andy Murray's Wimbledon results have been very good

(especially compared to other British players) so why can't people support him a bit more?

He isn't my favourite tennis player, and I don't really expect him to win a Grandslam,

but it's sad to see people be so against him. On Gary's point about Sampras, I don't think he can considered on Federer's level. His era of tennis was far less competitive, and he never completed the career Grandslam. Federer has all-time records for wins of tournaments at every level, as well as Olmypic gold, etc. He also has a class and genius when playing at his peak, that I don't think will ever be seen again. Sampras had a very 1-dimensional game. That's what I think anyway.

 

btw Don, I think it is clear who knows more about tennis. Considering my comment uses actual stats to prove a point, and in your comment you just come across as a very frustrated old man.

Either way, you know literally nothing about me, so I couldn't care less what your opinion of me is.

21/06/2012 01:10
avatar
Gregg. I also believe  his comment was said in jest. I was only offering an explanation for his lack of support. He is, as you allude to, a typically dour son of the manse. Scots will defend/support him to the ends of the earth, as it should, be but it does not take away from the facts which are that as yet he has not won a major tournament and he is not getting any younger or it seems wiser.
21/06/2012 11:58
avatar

Chris, this is in respose to your comment on the other article.

I don't think you understand where I am coming from. In my spare time I am an official featured columnist for Bleacher Report, in the tennis section (among some others.) Although this is just a hobby, it is in my interest to have extensive knowledge on the sport, and be able to give an unbiased and fair summary (otherwise, I would no longer be allowed to write official articles for the website.)

As a matter of interest, I invite any real fans of the sport to visit Bleacher Report. Discussion is given on the various aspects of the sport, and all opinions are welcome (unlike this site which I usually stay far away from, as the comments section is almost always a complete joke.)

 

Chris, your comment of 'cut the crap' is almost comical. It is startlingly obvious that my knowledge of tennis far exceeds your apparent fixation over Andy Murray. I have provided many relevant statistics in opposition to your comment, and if that is the best response you can come up with, I realise I was probably wasting my time.

21/06/2012 15:11
avatar

@ buttford (AKA birdbrain)

And all you ever do is slag off Andy Murray at every opportunity. You are totally obsessed by and with him, to a point bordering on insanity. Without doubt you need help.

SAD.

21/06/2012 00:26
avatar

He will always struggle for support from the English following his silly immature remarks about the football a few years ago. That said, the guy is just not good enough.

avatar
If not grand slam, Andy should win other trophies easily, he won only Brisbane so far I think this year...started well at the beginning of year but is going down hill....
21/06/2012 00:16
avatar
Give it up MSN. You're backing a total loser here !!! Murray is out again. Dare I say it - par for the course ??? Do we REALLY want to hear about yet ANOTHER failure on his behalf ??? 
20/06/2012 20:56
avatar
Kate.... tennis players are remembered for the number of `slams` they win... Murray has  none! Nadal is the same age and has won 8. Chang and Becker won slams in their teens. No one is really interested in the Bangkok masters or the Hong Kong open. Also I wouldnt say that Federer is the greatest player of all time. Great yes but not the best. I think Sampras would have beaten him on equal footing, age etc. So would Borg and McEnroe would have given him something to think about. It would be good to see Murray win a major but sadly he does not have the touch of Federer, the power of Nadal or the speed of Djokovic
20/06/2012 18:50
20/06/2012 21:41
avatar
ok Kate dont insult peoples intelligence .  He will not be remembered for his consistency which you cannot spell actually. he may be at 80 percent close to djokovic but compare the number of slams each one has won including Federer then you see the difference.  Hes not even close and hes never likely to win one  So really what do you know about tennis?    Not a lot
20/06/2012 21:44
avatar
Kate  why dont you return here when you know something about tennis.  That seems a good idea
Report
Please help us to maintain a healthy and vibrant community by reporting any illegal or inappropriate behavior. If you believe a message violates theCode of Conductplease use this form to notify the moderators. They will investigate your report and take appropriate action. If necessary, they report all illegal activity to the proper authorities.
Categories
100 character limit
Are you sure you want to delete this comment?
10 reasons to make MSN UK your homepage (© Microsoft)

latest tennis news

  • Caroline Wozniacki is through to the quarter-finals at a grand slam for the first time in two and a half years  AP

    Caroline Wozniacki made a long overdue return to tennis' biggest stage by stunning Maria Sharapova to reach the quarter-finals of the US Open.

  • Roger Federer bounced back in style after losing the first set  AP

    Roger Federer recovered from dropping his first set of the tournament to race into the fourth round of the US Open.

  • Andy Murray is through to the fourth round of the US Open  AP

    Andy Murray was content to have engineered a happy ending to another slightly tortuous journey in Louis Armstrong Stadium.

  • Novak Djokovic eased through to the fourth round  AP

    Novak Djokovic continued to look the man to beat at the US Open as he cruised into the fourth round.

  • Serena Williams made it a hat-trick of victories against Americans, beating Varvara Lepchenko  AP

    Serena Williams made it a hat-trick of victories over fellow Americans to move into the fourth round of the US Open.

  • Wimbledon champion Petra Kvitova lost in the third round of the US Open  AP

    Wimbledon champion Petra Kvitova became the latest big-name casualty at the US Open but Serena Williams continued her march through the draw.

  • Roger Federer, pictured, defeated Sam Groth to reach the third round of the US Open  AP

    Roger Federer nullified the big serving of Australian Sam Groth to move into the third round of the US Open.

  • Grigor Dimitrov faces a tricky test in round three  AP

    Grigor Dimitrov will attempt to do in the third round of the US Open what only one player has managed in 28 matches - beat David Goffin.

  • Simona Halep was dumped out of the US Open  AP

    Mirjana Lucic-Baroni has had many dark days so it was not hard to believe her when she described beating Simona Halep to reach the fourth round of the US Open as the best day of her life.

  • Maria Sharapova, pictured, battled her way past Sabine Lisicki and into the fourth round of the US Open  AP

    Maria Sharapova overcame Sabine Lisicki to set up a tasty fourth-round clash with Caroline Wozniacki at the US Open.

  • Andy Murray will meet Russian Andrey Kuznetsov in round three in New York  AP

    Andy Murray is back on track at the US Open and finds his nightmare draw opening up.

  • Novak Djokovic cruised into the third round of the US Open

    Novak Djokovic could not be happier with his form after coasting through his first two matches at the US Open.

  • Serena Williams, pictured, was in impressive form as she dispatched Vania King

    Serena Williams breezed into the third round of the US Open and saw the draw open up around her.

  • Lleyton Hewitt fell at the first hurdle at Flushing Meadows  AP

    Lleyton Hewitt was unable to cause another upset at the US Open as he went down in straight sets to sixth seed Tomas Berdych in the first round.

  • Agnieszka Radwanska, pictured, was dumped out of the US open by Shuai Peng  AP

    Maria Sharapova survived an attritional battle against Romania's Alexandra Dulgheru to reach the third round of the US Open but Agnieszka Radwanska became the first major casualty.